Evaluation teams
You run adversarial tests and need findings to land in controls, not just reports.
GovTune turns red-team traces into governance findings, control recommendations, escalation logic, and decision records. We are opening a small number of design partner pilots with teams that already run AI evaluations or govern high-stakes AI systems.
Request pilot accessMost red-team work loses force after the finding. The trace is technical. The control owner is organizational. The board artifact arrives late, if it arrives at all.
GovTune is the translation layer. It reads evaluation evidence and helps draft the governance object that should follow: finding, control, owner, severity, escalation path, and decision record.
This is not a public model launch. It is an early design-partner program for teams that can bring real workflows, real constraints, and real review standards.
The pilot is built around one operating question: can the evidence from an evaluation become a governance action without losing the thread?
GovTune is not meant to replace evaluators or reviewers. It is meant to preserve the chain from technical trace to accountable decision.
Bring a red-team trace, evaluation run, incident record, or structured finding from your current workflow.
GovTune drafts the finding in a format a review board, risk committee, or control owner can use.
The output maps evidence to candidate controls, owners, verification steps, and escalation triggers.
The system keeps an audit trail from evidence to recommendation so the decision can be reviewed later.
You run adversarial tests and need findings to land in controls, not just reports.
You review AI risk evidence and need a cleaner path from trace to accountable action.
You own model risk, safety, assurance, or escalation workflows in a high-stakes deployment.
You can pressure-test the product with real use cases, clear constraints, and serious feedback.
A useful pilot should show whether GovTune can preserve evidence quality, reduce handoff loss, and produce governance artifacts that withstand review.
The output is not a demo transcript. The output is a tested workflow: what evidence comes in, what governance object comes out, who reviews it, and what changes in the organization because of it.
Use this form if you have a concrete evaluation, governance, assurance, or AI risk workflow where trace-to-control translation matters.